At
the ICC today, defense witness Yusuf Adek, a traditional leader from the Pageya
clan, went through cross examination by the prosecution. Two days before he had
undergone examination-in-chief (that is when a witness answers questions coming
from the lawyer who called him/her to the court to testify) during which he
went through the history of the LRA conflict, Kony’s way of living, peace talk
negotiations and other dynamics of the LRA conflict.
Prosecution’s counsel
Benjamin Gumpert asked Mr. Adek several questions during the cross examination.
Among them were the Acholi norms regarding looting, killings of women and
children, abduction and other issues like the LRA attacks on communities and
escape from the LRA.
Mr. Adek told court that
the Acholi culture does not allow killing of women, children and looting. In
fact, “When you are going into the army,
your mother tells you-do not kill a woman, donot kill a child, do not loot… the
Acholi culture respects children, they consider a child an angel [Malaika]”
he said. He also said the Acholi culture doesn’t allow burning of huts and
abductions either.
He therefore argued that
all these crimes are happening in the present days because soldiers are not
following the norms. Gumpert also asked Adek of his knowledge of attacks waged
in the areas of Koch, Padibe and Bolo and the mutilation of body parts such as
the arms, ears and mouths and how he got to know about it.
Mr. Adek said he was not
sure of exactly what happened in Koch and Padibe but he heard from a former Resident
District Commissioner (RDC) who himself crossed one river three times during an
attack in Bolo.
In response to the
question of how hard it is for a soldier to escape from the LRA, Adek said he
wasn’t sure, but a former commander- Okuti told him that it is very hard to
escape. “…you fear to tell even your bodyguard” he recalled Okuti mentioning
Mr. Adek also narrated
how the same RDC had mobilized community members to attack the LRA using machetes,
spears, bows and arrows against his [Adek] advice, a venture which became a
boomerang and caused him [RDC] to cross the same river three times after the
LRA retaliated. The witness asserted that it was due to his effort that Kony
reversed his decision of attacking Bungatira. Mr. Adek added that it was his
effort that forced Kony to sermon his commanders against the planned attack.
“If they think machetes,
spears, bows and arrows can win wars, why don’t they give machetes, bows and
arrows to government soldiers?” Adek said.After the prosecution finished
their cross examination of the witness, the defense was also allowed to ask the
witness again pursuant to rule 140 (2) of the ICC rules of procedures which
allows defense to ask their witness again, after being cross examined.
Adek’s testimony attracted
questions from members of the public at the live screening in Gulu. For
instance, one community member questioned why witnesses’oath are not taken in
the open court. After the cross examination of Adek, defense called the second
witness who was protected through face and audio distortion.
No comments:
Post a Comment